Thread: Parking Orbit
View Single Post
  #3  
Old February 17th 06, 08:34 PM posted to sci.space.policy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Parking Orbit


Hello - I am new to this Group - but I do have some insight to this
astonishing Question?

180 Degrees Being the infra-spectrum in which we can see and operate in that
the temperature is fine for working in? - not too much?

Also the indexing of the interior is a advantage in that the interior is
really the importance of the overall in that the indexed interior is a
fundamental in that the overall importance in that the overall input pattern
is a fundamental?

Question though? With the Moon so interconnected and seemingly ineventfully
- connected to the Tide Lines on the planet - could the Moon be a poor
destination in that I believe that the Solar Winds (Geo-magnetical forces)
are the
willing and given in that the overall is very efficient as is!? Very light
craft as landed
before - (as with more propulsion) are event
full enough!?

I hope this answers your Question? I also as my Web Space below serves -
answer Questions about almost anything?

Here is my Web Space Address?

http://www.members.shaw.ca/finitesystems/index.html

Another thing - as I am an experienced Networking Cohesive newsgroup
person? - as I may have Just witnessed a simple thing as I Just read 1
Posting - please do not do that to Me if you did what you did or you will
surely see the other side?

Casper












"Rand Simberg" wrote in message
...
On 17 Feb 2006 10:12:33 -0800, in a place far, far away, "Will McLean"
made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a
way as to indicate that:

How practical is it to tailor a parking orbit for lunar missions that
is reasonably efficent to reach from KSC and precesses at 180 degrees a
lunar month?


What's wrong with 360?