$$ UN-Einstein (Ph.T-coup-GR) SR-2 ..the SEQUEL:
Tom Roberts wrote: Mike wrote: Tom Roberts wrote: -=-
Am I free to call the "same theory" then Robert's Relativity, or RR,
rather than Eisntein's SR and declare Einstein wrong?
-=-
What I described is known by all physicists _today_ as SR. There are
differences in derivation from that in Einstein's original 1905 paper,
but those are not sufficient to warrant a different name. We have
_learned_ a thing or three since 1905. shrug
-=-
While we may use a different derivation for SR than Einstein originally
used, we still call it "Special Relativity" and attribute the theory to
Einstein, because that's how such attributions are done. IOW: science is
not frozen in time in 1905. shrug

$$ SR-2 the SEQUEL (Ph.T-coup-GR SR).
A followup to a DRAMA (SR) is a SEQUEL (SR2) ..NOT the "SAME name".
We have AUTHENTiC (Einstein) SR and we have corrupted Ph.T coup SR.
We have AUTHENTiC (Einstein) GR and we have corrupted Ph.T coup GR.
Don't CHANGE a theory and SAY it HAS the SAME name and author, duh.
Say, "Ph.T-coup-GR SR" ..or simply "SR-2". ```Brian.


Tom Roberts
Light Speed refutes Special Relativity 2.
SR-2 the SEQUEL (Ph.T-coup-GR SR).