"TMG" wrote in message
...


"TMG" wrote in message
...
George Hammond wrote:

Hammond claims a child sees a "magnified" world compared
to an adult. Someone recently protested if a child and adult
point the same object their arms point to the same point in space
.... so how can the child be seeing a vastly larger object?

and faster - see below.

snip

In fact the Hammond metric is already well known to relativity where
it is called the "conformal metric" and t' is called the "conformal
time".
Of course in relativity, the transformation dt = a(t)dt' is only a
convenient "coordinate transformation" and t' is not the real physically
observable (clock) time. However, Hammond points out that in
subjective space it is known that growth (e.g. brain growth) not only
causes a spatial magnification, it also causes an increase in clock rate
(i.e. mental speed), so therefore conformal time ACTUALLY IS
"physical clock time" in subjective space.

I thought you had previously concluded that there is "no grav. time
dilation in R-W space." and "One can see immediately that the "universe
expansion factor", a(t), only dilates the space part of the metric and not
the time part."

[Hammond]
There is no time dilation in R-W space. However subjective human
space is not described by the R-W metric.... it is described by the
"Conformal metric" which DOES dilate both time and space.
This is an experimentally verified fact... since it is a fact of
common experience that human intelligence (mental speed in
bits/second) increases linearly for the first 18 years of life.
Both the RW metric and the Conformal metric are known
to be valid solutions to the Einstein Field Equations, and it is
simply a matter of observation as to which is observed..... fact is,
the RW metric is observed in Objective spacetime, and the
Conformal metric is observed in Subjective space; I'm here
to tell you.
Fact is, the RW metric explains Hubble, and the Conformal
metric explains the Human Growth Curve and the human
phenomena we call "GOD".

You seem to have plugged unrelated metrics together, at least one of which
includes "God".


[Hammond]
The relation of the R-W to the Conformal metric is
well known. God *IS* described by the conformal
metric.

But, why don't you see if s.p.research will pick up this "Child Growth
Curve = Hubble Expansion" idea and critique.

[Hammond]
Already sent it to sci.physics.research and sci.astro.research.
the moderators of those groups, such as Ted Bun are yuppie
prigs who are so jealous of me they could scream. They deliberately
and eagerly suppress anything I post to their little "private moron's
atheist club" and usually with such furtive remarks as "rejected for obvious
reasons" (one of Ted Bun's comments to me).


You might be on to something - at least as a first order approximation of
God (since Friedman is a 1st order approximation cosmology).

[Hammond]
First order my butt.... Friedman's solution is exactly correct and
has been known to be ever since Einstein himself printed a
personal retraction of his initial disbelief in 1922. Friedman was
a hero who bailed out Einstein's butt for him when he couldn't
figure out how to prevent the collapse of the universe and was
beleagured by the eintire physics community. The Friedman
solution was the historic Waterloo of the last Einstein critics.

Good luck George.

You said it...

========================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
========================================