"Michael Walsh" wrote ...

Paul Blay wrote:

That is only true for certain values of 'Creationism' - and you have put
forward nothing to indicate how common those values are.

Many of the believers in "Creationism" don't worry about this and just
accept what is written in the Bible.

It which case their "Creationism" is only as internally consistant as the Bible
they are using.

What is it that you believe we are arguing about?

Your statement

""Creationism" is internally consistent and cannot be disproved."

is provably incorrect for the first half for a significant (and in my opinion
probably majority) of values of "creationism".

The second half of the statement is misleading in that while certain
types and claims of "Creationism" can not be disproved they often
put forward 'proof' and 'logic' to support their beliefs and _those_
supporting arugments can often be disproved.