"Michael Walsh" wrote in message ...

Paul Blay wrote:

Maybe someone who's got better access to the material actually used
can provide an idea of how common this sort of 'evidence based
creationism' is.

I never suggested and certainly would not approve of "Creationism"
being taught as a science.

I restricted myself to claiming that "Creationism" is internally consistent
and cannot be disproved.

That is only true for certain values of 'Creationism' - and you have put
forward nothing to indicate how common those values are.