Unlike anyone here I have the luxury of knowing the the process of
stellar collapse is far more complicated and with more cycles than what
is currently proposed.

That is why in 1990 or 4 years before SN1987A was observed I had
already constructed outer boundary rings with a smaller ring at
intersection, (btw ,it is the only writing I ever copyrighted ).

http://th.nao.ac.jp/openhouse/1998/v...e4/sn1987a.jpg

These may not be the signature of the death throes of a star but rather
the birth of a solar system,that's right !,nobody thought that there
are intermdiate stages in stellar evolution.

It also shows that attempting to reconcile a circumfernce with a center
using the linguistic tinsel of BH cosmology is a mug's game,sort of
Zeno's paradox imposed on the cosmos.If you want to join the theortical
game of baffling yourself then black holes are for you.

Even though stellar process is useful,the indignities and novelties
that theorists impose of the cosmos now only look silly rather than
its desired effect.

Those rings represent natural effeciency in stellar evolution,perhaps
someday I will explain that everyone is surrounded by the geometrical
clues to natural effeciency and it is what makes the Earth
geometrically special for the variety of geometric forms displaying
beauty and effeciency.That is what I see in those rings.