Thread
:
Neutron star and no black hole
View Single Post
#
20
November 9th 05, 07:23 AM
Saul Levy
external usenet poster
Posts: n/a
Neutron star and no black hole
I didn't know you were around 200,000 years or so ago, BEERT!
I haven't seen the Magellanic Clouds for 20-30 years. So I saw just
pictures, not the real thing! Or, is that what you meant?
Saul Levy
On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 22:22:52 -0500,
(G=EMC^2
Glazier) wrote:
Hi Luigi Right you are it is not pulsing giving out radio photon
burst. Best call it a 20 mile in diameter round object with the mass
about 8 times greater than the Sun. Like it is written a type 2
supernova always leave behind a neutron star. I'll throw this in a
neutron stars gravity can compress all of humankind into an area the
size of a walnut. Still the gravity compression force of a BH could take
that compressed walnut and further compress it to a pea(or smaller)
Neutron stars must vary in size,and magnetic field strength. Mass of the
entire solar system would make a city size neutron star Read
that some where. Always like to keep in my mind the great power of a
pulsar's magnetic field for as a single object it must have the
strongest field. How does it beam it so tight, Such narrow cones. Makes
me think along laser emissions. Well we have counted 100,000 of these
exotic objects in our galaxy since their discovery in the mid 60s. I
hope one of those was found as a remnant in the Crab Nebula,or Supernova
1987A Those two explosions were witnessed by humankind. I saw 1987A as
did most people.. Bert
Saul Levy