.. . .

On page 15 there seems to be equation (31, I don't put the
equation below, but only the idea of it) for already unified
(gravity and electromagnetic fields).

Einstein curvature = Geometrized Maxwell tensor

Are you using this equation for curved space-time in your
calculations or something else ?


Hannu, if it is handy, would you mind posting the equation you are asking
about with some context. My copy of this is buried somewhere in my attic.

.. . .

Do you have massive vector bosons (call it X) like W+ and W- but
now corresponding magnetic charges (X -magnetic charge and
X +magnetic charge)?


Not fully developed, but I think the answer will be, YES. But, even the
KNOWN W+ and W- should carry a magnetic charge, since in decaying, say, a
neutrino into an electron, the W+ must -- based on my earlier results --
also carry away one unit of magnetic charge in addition to one unit of
electric charge. So, the X+ and X- will have the same internal symmetries
as the W+ and W-, but a) will be more massive because of the larger charge
arrived at through a weak version of the Dirac Quantization Condition and b)
very importantly, will couple only RIGHT-HANDED chiral states, thus leading
to a SU(2)L x SU(2)R weak interaction. If you look at my Volovik citation,
you will see that is an important step on the road to unifying the particle
phenomenology of quarks and leptons and the gauge generators of weak and
strong interactions to arrive at electromagnetic interaction sitting across
the weak and strong interactions thus unifying all three, which is where I
am ultimately driving. I think B-L using SU(4) is the ultra-high energy
symmetry of QCD, and when you combine this with SU(2)L x SU(2)R, you get
leptoquark unification, again, see Volovik. The one "inelegant" feature of
Volovik which needs to be cleaned up is the "spinon / holon" fudge to deal
with spin 1/2. It turns out that the magnetic monopoles add degrees of
freedom that will overcome this fudge and yield an even cleaner result where
what are now the spinons and the holons each have spin 1/2, and yet the
fermions they combine to form also have spin 1/2 due to a beautiful
conspiracy between the mathematics of chirality and the mathematics of
magnetic monopoles and the internal symmetries of isospin and leptoquark
QCD. I hope to demonstrate all of this in a future paper. (Problem is, I
have at least ten papers in the queue which will dramatically add to our
understanding of HEP. First priority is to fully nail NuTeV at .005, so
people will see that this stuff really is right and experimentally
confirmed, and not just wheel spinning, and some of the big shots will start
to pay attention.)

It is the third member of the triplet, call it X^0 corresponding to the Z,
(I called it Z' in my last post) which a preliminary calculation suggests
may pick up the extra .002 in the weak mixing angle to go from the .003
NuTeV anomaly I have theoretically arrived at so far to the total .005
anomaly observed experimentally.

Jay.