J. Scott Miller wrote:
In Fo wrote:

http://community.webtv.net/hotmail.c...gBangDisproved

Prime


Unfortunately, I don't have the time to visit your site, but likely it
is that the Big Bang is fine and you don't have a clue of what you are
talking about. But, if you care to bring your points into this forum
instead of directing folks to your web site, I am sure I or others here
would be more than happy to demonstrate this to you.
The big bang is disproved by the observation of a galaxy
eight times the mily way at only 800 million years
away from the supposed bang

See the references I have indicated in my answer to that
post above.
More information about this galaxy HUDF-JD2:

1)
DIRECT EVIDENCE FOR AN EARLY REIONIZATION OF THE UNIVERSE?
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/astro-ph/pdf/0509/0509605.pdf

2)
NASA Finds 'Big Baby' Galaxies in Newborn Universe
Spitzer space telescope press release:
http://www.spitzer.caltech.edu/Media.../release.shtml

3)
Space Daily:
Mature Galaxy Found In Early Universe Eight Times More Massive Than
Milky Way.
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/stell...stry-05ze.html

4)
Evidence for a Massive Post-Starburst Galaxy at z =E2=88=BC 6.5
http://www.eso.org/~jvernet/mobasher05.pdf

From reference 4)
In summary therefore, Figures 4 and 5 suggest that the HUDF-JD2 is
likely to be an extremely massive galaxy observed at 6 z 8 which
formed the bulk of its stars at zform 9. The size of the observed Ks
-3.6 micrometers break implies a post-starburst system now being
observed in a quiescent state.

Translated into english the above paragraph gives:

The researchers are particularly intrigued by the fact that star
formation in the galaxy seems to have already been completed. This
implies that the bulk of the activity that built up the galaxy had
occurred even earlier. (Reference 3)

This object is eight times the Milky way.
http://ipac.jpl.nasa.gov/media_images/ssc2005-19a2.jpg