nightbat wrote
Ray Vingnutte wrote:
On 16 Sep 2005 17:23:50 -0700
"Raving Loonie" wrote:
Ray Vingnutte wrote:
Well maybe...maybe not..
http://www.spaceflightnow.com/news/n0509/15asteroids/
Any consequence arising from that hail storm of asteriods falling into
the sun ?
Wouldn't have thought so, the sun being so much more massive compared to
a planet or protoplanet, the sun probably hardly noticed it ;-) No idea
of an estimate for the accumulative mass of asteroids that would have
gone into the sun but I would guess that by the time it was happening
the sun had got well underway as far as it's own mass was concerned.
Just me guessing..
RL
nightbat
This subject Officer Ray and Cadet Raving Loonie is very
important as referenced by the link of scientist's attempting to
correlate planetary and protoplanet impact evidence with remaining
observed space asteroids. According to my profound Universe model not
only does asteroid impact play a role of Universe dynamics but comet
impacts as well. For instance Jupiter the great gas giant shows
paradoxically that it has all the potential for being a star yet some
distant galactic process or major cosmological event evidently played a
part in its present make-up and condition. As RL indicates a true star
as our solar one would most likely have been able to absorb immense
quantities of inner solar system asteroid body impacts without process
blinking due to its inherent huge mass. However if the same event
consisted of immense comet storm the results could theoretically be much
different. The possible neutralizing effect of % very large quantities
of infalling heavy ice and dust bodies could most likely not cause
stellar destruction of the once star but stress it so as to quite likely
extinguish its normal fusion ignition thresh point chroma effects
process. Plasma sharing of sister neutron or close gravitating stars is
known, but since the mutual shared material is not normally heavy ice
neutralizing material mass, ongoing accreditation continues. Now then if
an event occurs that does permit accrual of neutralizing material a
unique chain of events is most possibly theoretically created ( " Black
Comet " ) far different then normal Chandra stellar upper mass
accumulation main sequence occurrence.
Taking about the planet Jupiter, it is not impossible that at the time
being possibly event closer in the original direction or particular
galaxy position of first entrance of incoming planetary comet storm
occurrence, it very likely could have taken the blunt of gravitational
attracted impacts traveling into the solar system itself. If this
nightbat model theory premise is correct then at one time the original
binary solar system sun now (Jupiter) could have received such an influx
of far or outer galaxy arriving mass neutralizing super dense heavy ice
comet body material as to extinguish it's outer fusion process ignited
gas shell envelope. Per observation gas giant Jupiter and other
evidenced solar system planetary crater impacts now presents just such
an correlating observed body evidence. And this too once ignited loss of
the second Sun would correlate to the sudden disappearance of the most
likely cold blooded evolved makeup of the initial species Dinosaurs not
caused by present conflicting and now rejected theory of possible
climate effecting large incoming asteroid. For an potential large
asteroid Earth impact would not entire cross or single species
selectively entire Earth eliminate, this being the comet ending event
model original weak premise and falsifying evidence.
Excellent Universal model pondering Officers and Cadet and continue your
logical observations.
carry on,
the nightbat