Thread: SRB costs
View Single Post
  #6  
Old August 24th 05, 11:25 AM
Brian Gaff
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I'm just confused now. Are we saying that it actually costs that amount to
make a set, or are we saying they will not reuse them? Where is the high
cost in reuse?

Brian

--
Brian Gaff....Note, this account does not accept Bcc: email.
graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them
Email:
__________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ __________


"Jon S. Berndt" jsb.at.hal-pc-dot.org wrote in message
...
"Jon S. Berndt" jsb.at.hal-pc-dot.org wrote in message
news:430bc9f0$0$10626

"Herb Schaltegger" wrote in

Before we come up with a realistic appraisal we would have to know
whether 5-segment SRBs end up being selected for the design baseline,
wouldn't we?


Oh, yeah. Forgot about that. Assume regular, not premium. :-)

Jon


Also, I'm wondering if "... Thiokol will produce and refurbish 35 Reusable
Solid Rocket Motor flight sets (70 motors) and three flight support
motors."
means 35 complete and new motors, or if it is more like a "subscription",
where there may only be 15 motors, but some are refurbished to supply a
total of 35 "logical" sets. Is that clear? :-)

(See:
http://www.msfc.nasa.gov/news/news/r...02/02-164.html)

Jon