No, "diligent" would have meant conducting a WCDT and FRF the first
time Discovery was rolled out to the pad, since this was advertised as
a "test flight." It also would have meant planning for Edwards as the
primary landing sight.

Obviously the finding of the CAIB were insufficient in your eyes. I
take it that was an opinion being voiced.

Name who the "most" are please - cheers.

A majority, more than 50 percent, those not easily conned, those with a
lick of sense, those not "born yesterday." Do you get the idea?

Not really since you have generalised here are unable to cite any names
or have brought other evidence to back your assertion. The question
is, can you?

Sincerely,
Bash