newedana wrote:
At present day there is no reliable science concerned to the structure
of solid metal. Neither exists also a basic science for formation of
metal alloy. For example, why iron does not make an alloy with copper?
Why mercury does not dissolve iron cobalt and nickle despite that it
dissolves gold, silver, copper and etc.?

You better read Dr. Hansik Yoon's New Physics' titled " Natural Science

Founded on a New atomic Model" (www.yoonsatom.net). The answer for the
problemhysical basis for melting points of alloys is very simple
according to his new principle.

His atomic model is constructed with tiny persistent current rings
surrounding its nucleus. Energy level of the current ring is higher
when it is closer to its nucleus, just in reverse to that of current
atomic model. There acts attraction between these orbital electron
rings with resonant frequency, while repulsion takes place between them

if they have non-resonant frequencies, which is determined by their
orbital parameter.

It is very natural, metals built with the same kind of atoms have a
higher
melting point, because all of their electron rings in their every
electron
shells are exactly the same respectively, thus there acts the strongest

attraction between them to give a higher melting point.

On the other hand metals built with different kinds of atoms have a
lowerer melting point because they have limited number of electron
rings
mutually resonant in their electron shells, so weaker attractions
between
its component atoms to give a lowerer melting
points.

If their component atoms have no resonant electron rings at all
in their structure they do not make an alloy, instead they have to
repulse. You shoud note that k shells of all the element atoms have
different radii, and L, M, N, ..etc. shells also, depending on their
atomic volumes. For example, atomic volume of hydrogen is 14.1 while
uranium's is 12. 5 despite that it is wrapped with 15 layers of
electron shells.

Imagine the radii of k shells of both atoms. I find in his book, the
structure
of metal ceystal is clearly explained, satisfying following physical
characters:
higher density, higher conductibity of heat and electricity, higher
ductility and
stiffness, and silvery apperance.

newedana


The only way for Yoon model to have possibility of existence is
if the law of physics inside the atom is not the same outside.

I recommend you to get this book:



http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg...books&n=507846

It shows the complete foundational development of Quantum
Mechanics from Planck to Born. It has complete mathematics
and the derivations of all equations from Bohr to Heisenberg
to Schrodinger. It's one of a kind that you can't find in
other books.

Master it first before trying to debunk QM.

Also try to get this.

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg...=UTF8&v=glance

It's complete conceptual foundation and mathematics of Fourier
methods that completely give the account of the atoms in terms
of the wave properties of the electron. In Yoon book. He tried
to remove the wave properties and make it completely modified
Bohr orbit style. How can you ignore the fact that QM almost
explain everything.

To show Yoon can explain more than QM as well as explain the
same data. You must try to explain how the Yoon methods can
approximate all the wave behavior and calculations of QM.
For it, you have to modify some of Yoon principles and add
more such as more degree of freedtom inside the atomic realm.

First have utter master of QM. Without doing that. How can
you break it apart without knowing its full treatment of the
fact and concepts.

Goodluck.

p6