newedana wrote:
".................. However, man gradually turned out to be like an
animal in viewing the nature ever since the first discovery of atomic
structure by Rutherford, and the electron by Irish physicist G. J.
Stoney and British physicist J. J. Thomson et al around 1897. They
stated that the electron was nothing else than a mass particle building

atoms of all the material system, in respect that its motion obeying
projectile mechanics. The philosophical implication of their thoughts
was profound. ...................... These ideologies say that reliable

knowledge never comes from a shadowy work of human brain, but from real

things touchable, visible and audible with their sensory organs, since
human being is nothing else than a kind of animal species evolved from
single-cell life happen to be emerged on the earth, according to
Charles Darwin's evolutional doctrine. ....................."

" ..................... Under this philosophical background, there
emerged two basic physical theories in the beginning of last century.
One was the quantum mechanical theory initiated by Max Plank, and the
other was [a set of] two theories of relativity, proposed by Albert
Einstein. .................. Both are allegedly particle physics based
on the philosophy of materialism or positivism. In order to describe
the nature with their logic of particle physics, energy and light that
are essentially continuous entities in character had to be subdivided
into unit particles. These particles were called quanta and photon, the

smallest ultimate energy and light particles, indivisible further into
much smaller units. However, this postulation was immediately against
the natural law. .................."

Dr. Hansik Yoon stated in the preface of his book, "Natural Science
Founded on A New Atomic Model". You may read the whole preface from
http://www.yoonsatom.net

Dr. Hansik Yoon continued. "............... It was the same idea as
that the numerical gap between 1 and 2 could be filled with the
smallest ultimate decimals of infinite numbers. It is a trick to
persuade people to believe improbable things or events as real. If we
use this trick, for example, we can readily prove that [the length of]
two sides of a triangle is equal to the third one.
..................... However, obviously this is no more a triangle."

"............... Continuous entities are theoretically impossible to
subdivide into final subunits, since they are divisible endlessly, and
subdivided final products have the same as their initia1 character.
Energy and light are such entities. Atoms or bio-cells are exceptions,
because they are impossible to be subdivided into much smaller unit
particles without sacrificing their initial atomic or cellular
characters. ........................"

"............... For example, the quantum oscillator, the latest atomic

model, was built based on this idea of particle physics. The kinetic
energy of orbital electron orbiting in three dimensional space forming
an electron cloud cannot balance out theoretically with its potential
energy. .................. Nevertheless, these two energies of orbital
electron are unreasonably balanced in the Shrodinger's wave equation.
It conflicts with a plain truth of physical law. .....................
So the orbital electron of the quantum oscillator cannot perform a real

oscillation, but only an imaginary oscillation in the mathematical
equation. ..............................=AD......"

Dr. Hansik Yoon also stated in the preface of his book that
"............... The magnetism induced by this tiny persistent current
ring that has allegedly the Meissoner's diamagnetism effect against
external magnetism governs all the physicochemical phenomena occurring
in material world. It is not the electric attraction force believed
from the 17th century up to now. ..............................=AD..."

From Dr. Yoon's book(http://www.yoonsatom.net).

newedana

To continue with the above. I'll give you some hope about Yoon.
Although he misrepresented so many things. There is something
in the last paragraph above. The right point of view to consider
is that in addition to electric attractive force, there is also
hidden magnetism effect that govern all physiochemical phenomena.
Using microscopic scalar sensor. We can detect that in an
element. It is NOT just the electric field at work. There is
also some kind of magnetic coupling effect that escape
the magnetic field probe such as stern gerlach experiment,
etc. It is to this that qi is related. Contrary to science
which says that only moving charges can produce magnetic
field. We can precipitate magnetic field out of thin air or
quantum vacuum without any moving charges or electron. Also
try to study Lockyer stuff. I'm thinking if the magnetic effect
involves the entire nucleus too where Lockyer argued it is not
gluon and pion exchanging mediating strong force but entirely
electromagnetic with magnetic moments hyperfunctions. We
are still determining the validity (if there is) of his model
and how qi is related to it all. Invest in qi research and
you will learn many truth as it involves the most cutting
edge area of Quantum physics and even relativity.

p6