newedana wrote:
".................. However, man gradually turned out to be like an
animal in viewing the nature ever since the first discovery of atomic
structure by Rutherford, and the electron by Irish physicist G. J.
Stoney and British physicist J. J. Thomson et al around 1897. They
stated that the electron was nothing else than a mass particle building

atoms of all the material system, in respect that its motion obeying
projectile mechanics. The philosophical implication of their thoughts
was profound. ...................... These ideologies say that reliable

knowledge never comes from a shadowy work of human brain, but from real

things touchable, visible and audible with their sensory organs, since
human being is nothing else than a kind of animal species evolved from
single-cell life happen to be emerged on the earth, according to
Charles Darwin's evolutional doctrine. ....................."

" ..................... Under this philosophical background, there
emerged two basic physical theories in the beginning of last century.
One was the quantum mechanical theory initiated by Max Plank, and the
other was [a set of] two theories of relativity, proposed by Albert
Einstein. .................. Both are allegedly particle physics based
on the philosophy of materialism or positivism. In order to describe
the nature with their logic of particle physics, energy and light that
are essentially continuous entities in character had to be subdivided
into unit particles. These particles were called quanta and photon, the

smallest ultimate energy and light particles, indivisible further into
much smaller units. However, this postulation was immediately against
the natural law. .................."

Dr. Hansik Yoon stated in the preface of his book, "Natural Science
Founded on A New Atomic Model". You may read the whole preface from
http://www.yoonsatom.net

Dr. Hansik Yoon continued. "............... It was the same idea as
that the numerical gap between 1 and 2 could be filled with the
smallest ultimate decimals of infinite numbers. It is a trick to
persuade people to believe improbable things or events as real. If we
use this trick, for example, we can readily prove that [the length of]
two sides of a triangle is equal to the third one.
..................... However, obviously this is no more a triangle."

"............... Continuous entities are theoretically impossible to
subdivide into final subunits, since they are divisible endlessly, and
subdivided final products have the same as their initia1 character.
Energy and light are such entities. Atoms or bio-cells are exceptions,
because they are impossible to be subdivided into much smaller unit
particles without sacrificing their initial atomic or cellular
characters. ........................"

"............... For example, the quantum oscillator, the latest atomic

model, was built based on this idea of particle physics. The kinetic
energy of orbital electron orbiting in three dimensional space forming
an electron cloud cannot balance out theoretically with its potential
energy. .................. Nevertheless, these two energies of orbital
electron are unreasonably balanced in the Shrodinger's wave equation.
It conflicts with a plain truth of physical law. .....................
So the orbital electron of the quantum oscillator cannot perform a real

oscillation, but only an imaginary oscillation in the mathematical
equation. ..............................=AD......"

Dr. Hansik Yoon also stated in the preface of his book that
"............... The magnetism induced by this tiny persistent current
ring that has allegedly the Meissoner's diamagnetism effect against
external magnetism governs all the physicochemical phenomena occurring
in material world. It is not the electric attraction force believed
from the 17th century up to now. ..............................=AD..."

From Dr. Yoon's book(http://www.yoonsatom.net).

newedana

My dear Newedana,

You will deceive yourself so much if you will only rely on
Dr. Yoon book. He practically misrepresented the entire
foundation of science. Many of his data are wrong. His
principles don't make any actual scientific sense. He is
very creative though and *appear* to explain a lot.. but it's
all just handwaving.

I don't blame him though because he just couldn't accept
the *unconvensional* ideas of physics. He wants to justify
things as being purely classical and newtonian. This is the
same problem with physicists like Uncle Al who can't
accept the bizarre nature of qi. So they settle in the
familiar world of QM and Relativity and the mathematical
equations. Dr. Yoon is just a step backward from Uncle Al.

The following is a brief account of what is reality.

Fields are the real thing. Particles are just aspects
of it. For illustration. Think of the head of your dick
(or any guy dick). Imagine there are beings who can
only see the dick head and not the entire body (whose
anatomy from head to foot is invisible to him). He
would think the dick head represents the entire person.
But he is just not aware that the entire anatomy from
head to toe, which represents the "fields" are what is
the mother structure of the dick head (representing particle).
So when he would see liquid sprouting from it or the dick
oscillating or throbbing when entering a pussy. He would
think it describes the dick angular momemtum, magnetic spin,
mass, etc. Do you understand?? So don't treat particles
as the main actors. They are just supporting cast like
the dick. You must study the fields or the entire human
anatomy.

Another is that you must understand that before measurement,
there is no properties in quantum system. I have direct
constant experience in this. For example. When I'd treat
migrane in your brain. I can project the neurons hidden EM
scalar qi state (not yet known by science) in front of me
anywhere I am in the planet and I can manipulate the unmanifested
holographic template which can ultimately affect the wave
function of your brain. I'm still thinking if mainstream
humanity must be made aware of this. We are at a time when
psychological balance is far from okay and something like
this extra hidden function of reality may overwhelm the
human psychological load. Although the worldwide scrutiny of
this extended physics breakthrough may reverberate in all
aspects of science, medicine, psychology, etc. We need to
gauge the pros and cons of it. If you want to study qi.
First read some good QM textbook. You must have utter mastery
of it including the mathemetical formalism if you want
to describe the physics of qi in all its glory. Don't
waste time with Yoon. Study Qi and you will know firsthand
that the teachings of many stuff in Quantum physics and
even relativity is true.=20

p6