It could of been from one of the film cameras that saw the smoke (E60, E63, E20, E41, E31, E71, E52, or E217 (co-located with TV-3)). People often call video, "film." It could of been, they were calling film, "video" as the film was transferred to video?
-Boringguy
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by
[snip]
I don't recall *ever* seeing "dramatic video footage" of a puff,
although after the Rogers Report was released, I did see barely
discernible smoke at the location claimed for a "puff," on FOIA video
footage from camera TV-3. Since I'm not a lawyer, if anyone here saw
"dramatic" video (such as Rusthoven described) in an earlier release, I
would very much appreciate knowing where and when.
Challenger's Ghost
|