View Single Post
  #8  
Old July 12th 05, 01:40 PM
Ray Vingnutte
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 12 Jul 2005 03:45:05 -0700
"Raving Loonie" wrote:

Ray Vingnutte wrote:
On 10 Jul 2005 05:46:36 -0700
"Raving Loonie" wrote:

Ray Vingnutte wrote:
Note the date on this article, at the top of page, I guess this
must be thanks to Greysky...

http://www.gemini.edu/index.php?opti...3Dview&id=3D1=

39

Take another look at the ' date ' on the website ...

... from premonition to deja vue

Or should that be ...

... from deja vue to premonition.

RL


Ha, ha now its dated to before the impact happened. Greysky, it has
to be Greysky


=20
' Little doubt remains that the unprecedented quality of the Gemini
data will keep astronomers busy for years. ... '
=20
=20
see http://tinyurl.com/crt44 for full source
=20
Tuesday, July 12th. The excitement continues. ...


I reckon those numbers on the white board is someone trying to work out
the correct date, i can see 7-4-83, 9-4-98, 8-4-92, 7-5-78!! But not
9-7-05

=20
RL
--
=20
" ...
=20
Deep Impact Captured by Gemini Print
=20
Saturday, 02 July 2005
Page 1 of 2
Resources
=20
En Espa=F1ol - Versi=F3n adaptada en Chile
=20
The Gemini North telescope on Mauna Kea successfully captured the
dramatic fireworks display produced by the collision of NASA's Deep
Impact probe with Comet 9P/Tempel 1. Researchers in two control rooms
on Hawaii's Big Island (on Mauna Kea and in Hilo) were able to keep
enough composure amid an almost giddy excitement to perform a
preliminary analysis of the data. They concluded from the mid-infrared
spectroscopic observations that there was strong evidence for
silicates or rocky material exposed by the impact. Little doubt
remains that the unprecedented quality of the Gemini data will keep
astronomers busy for years. ... "
=20