You are quite free to believe such a stupid equation, E=3DMc^2. But you h=
ave to reconsider to use this equation E=3Dmc^2, if you teach younger gene=
rations of your science disciples who are innocently eager to know what is =
the atomic nuclear energy. If you explain atomic fission and fusion energy =
with the same, E=3Dmc^2, you have to realized that you become also stupid.
According to current physics, atomic fission and fusion are philosophicall=
y opposit reactions, in the former case, mass gain occurs, while in the lat=
er case, mass deficit or loss, due to nuclear reaction. Despite that both r=
eactions are the same exothermic. Gained and deficit mass are transformed a=
like into energy? bah! It is not a science but a kind of funny comics! Dr. =
Yoon explains elegantly both nuclear reactions with atomic electron rings a=
nd nuclear electron rings without violating any natural laws, unlike your p=
article physicists do desperately. Then you would rebut, how electrons can =
be in a nuclear structure, forming your strange nuclear electron ring? Yes,=
it is quite possible. Evidence is the =CE=B2-ray electrons ejected out fro=
m radioactive atomic nuclei, carrying a huge energy. Dr Yoon defined this n=
uclear electron ring to act as the nuclear strong force, possible to bind a=
number of protons in atomic nuclei against their repulsions.
I recommend you better read his textbook(www.yoonsatom.net)if you want to =
know more details, what is the origin of the rest of =CE=B1 and =CE=B3 rays=
.. newedana wrote