View Single Post
  #69  
Old May 27th 05, 02:52 PM
Lloyd Parker
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article .com,
"newedana" wrote:
Fission has nothing to do with electrons. You're an idiot.


hi there Hansik Yoon, unrepentant crank.........


I newedana posted on May 26, 3;38, you have to know the stupid origin of

equation, E=Mc^2.
According to Dr.Yoon, it starts from the special theory of relativity for

mass, m=m'(1-v^2/c^2)^-1/2. If we expand this to be a poly-nominal series,
it gives, m=m'[1+1/2(v/c)^2 + 3/8(v/c)^4 +. . . . .]. Since v/c is
negligibly small as in usual, we can eliminate after third term. Thus the
simplified equation becomes, (m-m')c^2 =1/2m'v^2=E, and E=Mc^2. Do you
believe this equation can explain the atomic nuclear energy? nonsense!

Then you replied we cannot cancel v/c.


If so, you have to know another way of proving the stupidity of E=mc^2.
Dr.Yoon ridiculed both deBroglei equation, λ=h/p, and the key equation of

your particle physicists, E=hν. From these two stupid equations another
stupid equation, E=mc^2 is straightly deduced. You see?
When deBroglei equation is applied to a photon( QM theorists defined
photon has zero mass, so they defined arbitrarily, E=pc, pc=hν) it
becomes 1/ν=h/mc, where λ=1/ν, p=mc. So the E=mc^2 is established,
combining with E=hν. Right??

Fission has nothing to do with electrons. You're an idiot.


You are quite free to believe such a stupid equation, E=Mc^2. But you have

to reconsider to use this equation E=mc^2, if you teach younger generations
of your science disciples who are innocently eager to know what is the
atomic nuclear energy. If you explain atomic fission and fusion energy with
the same, E=mc^2, you have to realized that you become also stupid.
According to current physics, atomic fission and fusion are

philosophically opposit reactions, in the former case, mass gain occurs,
while in the later case, mass deficit or loss, due to nuclear reaction.
Despite that both reactions are the same exothermic. Gained and defisitted
mass are transformed alike into energy. It is not a science but a kind of
funny comics! Dr. Yoon explains elegantly both nuclear reactions with atomic
electron rings and nuclear electron rings without violating any natural
laws, unlike your particle physicists do desperately. Then you would rebut,
how electrons can be in a nuclear structure, forming ypur strange nuclear
electron ring? Yes, it is quite possible. Evidence is the β-ray electrons
ejected out from radioactive atomic nuclei, carrying a huge energy. Dr Yoon
defined this nuclear electron ring to act as the nuclear strong force,
possible to bind a number of protons in atomic nuclei against their
repulsions.
I recommend you better read his textbook(www.yoonsatom.net)if you want to

know more details, what is the origin of the rest of α and γ rays..
newedana wrote

If I want to read fiction, there's lots better out there.