newedana wrote:
May 26, 3:38 am show options

Newsgroups: sci.physics, sci.chem, sci.astro,
alt.sci.physics.new-theories
From: - Find messages by this author
Date: 26 May 2005 00:38:35 -0700
Local: Thurs,May 26 2005 3:38 am
Subject: New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model
Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show
original | Report Abuse


hi there Hansik Yoon, unrepentant crank.........



You have to know the stupid origin of equation, E=Mc^2.

I know it. You obviously don't


According to Dr.Yoon, it starts from the special theory of relativity for mass,

There is no "special theory of relativity for mass".

Thanks for confirming once again that you don't know what you are
talking about.


m=m'(1-v^2/c^2)^-1/2

That formula is *vaguely* right - but E=mc^2 does *not* come from it.


If we expand this as a poly-nominal series, it gives,
m=m'[1+1/2(v/c)^2 + 3/8(v/c)^4 +. . . . .]

Congratulations, you got at least that right.


Since v/c is negligibly small as in usual, we can eliminate after third term.

Right again.


Thus the simplified equation becomes, (m-m')c^2 =1/2m'v^2=E, and E=Mc^2.

That is *not* the usual way of deriving E=mc^2. Try again.


Do you believe this equation can explain the atomic nuclear energy?

It can explain at least part of it. BTW, please make up your mind: do
you want to talk about atomic or about nuclear energy?


nonsense!

Why?

It is a *fact* that the energy released in nuclear reactions is equal
to the mass difference between the nuclei in the beginning and in the
end times c^2. Do you dispute that?


Bye,
Bjoern