View Single Post
  #67  
Old May 27th 05, 04:35 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



newedana wrote:

I newedana posted on May 26, 3;38,


I declare on May 27, 2005 declare that Newedana is a crank.
furthermore, if he is not Hansik Yoon then he must be a Yoon clone.

get over the silly third person talk..... newedana wrote, Newedana
said. what kind of silly person are you?

you have to know the stupid origin of equation, E=3DMc^2.
According to Dr.Yoon, it starts from the special theory of relativity fo=

r mass, m=3Dm'(1-v^2/c^2)^-1/2. If we expand this to be a poly-nominal seri=
es, it gives, m=3Dm'[1+1/2(v/c)^2 + 3/8(v/c)^4 +. . . . .]. Since v/c is ne=
gligibly small as in usual, we can eliminate after third term. Thus the sim=
plified equation becomes, (m-m')c^2 =3D1/2m'v^2=3DE, and E=3DMc^2. Do you b=
elieve this equation can explain the atomic nuclear energy? nonsense!

Then you replied we cannot cancel v/c.



i never said that knucklehead. can you read? can you comprehend? if
not, how can you even write a textbook Yoon?


If so, you have to know another way of proving the stupidity of E=3Dmc^=

2=2E
Dr.Yoon ridiculed both deBroglei equation, =CE=BB=3Dh/p, and the key equ=

ation of your particle physicists, E=3Dh=CE=BD. From these two stupid equa=
tions another stupid equation, E=3Dmc^2 is straightly deduced. You see?

there is a more fundamental derivation of E=3Dmc^2. no, i don't see
anything but you giving a lot of crap. if you want to prove it wrogn
show us an experiment which shows that and show us what your high
school maths give us....

yes, i do know another way of proving E=3Dmc^2, it's in all standard
textbooks. no need to use a taylor series expansion like you
knucklehead. it is exact. obviously, you've never had a decent physics
education. you are just dumb, Yoon.


I recommend you better read his textbook(www.yoonsatom.net)if you want t=

o know more details, what is the origin of the rest of =CE=B1 and =CE=B3 r=
ays. newedana wrote

newedana wrote a lot of crap. Yoon is full of crap. only teo
unimportant publications in his whole life, yet making big,
unsubstantiated claims about rewriting the whole foundations of
physics.