View Single Post
  #6  
Old May 25th 05, 03:30 PM
Double-A
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Luigi Caselli wrote:
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" ha scritto nel messaggio
...
Nature creates in pairs. For every action there is an equal action in
another direction. Inertia can become greater with more mass or greater
revolving speed of the same mass. Lets relate a white hole to a black
hole,as being relative to comparing an electron with a positron.(OK)
How can I put this all together and create reality out of it. White
holes and black holes explode in opposite directions White holes explode
outward,and black holes implode inward. White holes give to the space
gamma photons Black holes unleash their singularity. A white hole
has no singularity at its core. A black hole has squeezed its photons
into the singularity when imploding. White holes reach their critical
mass faster than black holes because they spin much faster. There are
as many white holes as there are flakes of snow in an endless storm.The
better we get at detecting them the more and more they be. Bert


Did you eat lots of Italian meat balls before posting this message?



And they're probably feeling rather "heavy" in his stomach after
theorizing about meatball-sized singularities!


We have lots of weird objects in the universe: black holes, pulsars,
gravastars, quark stars, dark energy stars, whatyouwant stars and you need
also white holes because you are a bit bored to have always the same boring
stars...

Before eating too much you said that GRB are caused by black holes when they
start a new universe and, even if weird, this is much more likely than white
holes...

Luigi Caselli



But then there's all the spaghetti.

Ah! String theory!

Double-A