wrote in message oups.com...
Like always, you are "parroting" what you read in textbooks, you can't
think by yourself. You are a typical example of those religious SR
crackpots
whose mind closes when they are confronting with a dissident opinion.

But you don't even *have* a dissident opinion.
A complete misunderstanding is what you have.
You find inconsistencies in your own view on a theory
by simply not having a clue what it is about and by
making one silly mistake after the other.

I have just shown you that you that your statement
| "Let's notice that T' = T/gamma. This is always the
| case, as the ratio T/T' depends on the velocity of
| the rocket, not on its position."
is completely wrong in the context that *you* provided.
And, just like you have been doing for so many years,
you build on your mistake to arrive at something silly.

Exercice for you: In my previous message there is one
word that should not be there. Find it.
Then explain what is wrong with what I said.


If you want to be taken seriously, try at least to refute my
demonstration
of the LT incoherence

But you have not applied the LT correctly, because you
made a mistake with your usage of the time dilation. I just
explained it. Don't you understand it? Even if I have
explained it to you hundreds of times?
Prove to me that you understood at least part of it by
doing the exercise I gave you.


, or at least to explain why gamma(xE-v*tE) =
(xE-vT)/gamma.
is wrong, according to your faithful follower thinking.

I don't have faith and I don't follow anything. I couldn't
care less whether special relativity is right or wrong. But
unlike you, I can apply it correctly because I understand
what the symbols and variables mean.



Don't forget that when xE=3, v=0.866, tE=5, T=9.608 (T is obtained from
the LT),
one gets 2(3-0.866*5) = (3-0.866*9.608)/2 , or -2.66 = -2.66 !
Use your brain, not your prejudices!

Of course, abuse (your specialty) is easier.

By now, you should be grown up enough to ignore the abuse.
Unless that is what you are *really* after :-)
Can you do the little exercise?
Or do I conclude -again- that you are cheating, Marcel?

Dirk Vdm