"But such information will probably be of little use or interest to the
archaeologist unless it serves to amplify some historical or cultural
detail. An astronomer may not understand why his information fails to
produce excitement because he does not fully grasp that archaeology is
a social science. Few astronomers have the training to completely
understand that distinction. The astronomer will generally fail to
consider how little value an isolated astronomical fact may have to an
archaeologist in the absence of a cultural context. The different
languages of astronomy (a "hard" science) and archaeology (a social
science) foster a lack of attention on the part of the Egyptology
community for ideas presented by astronomers."

http://www.cloudbait.com/archaeo/arce2004.html

I have to laugh at distinction between 'hard' science and social
science notwithstanding that you flatter yourselves by the unwarranted
title of astronomer.

Is it not bad enough that you cataloguing freaks ruined
Copernican/Keplerian astronomy that you have to go back and destroy the
exquisite ancient wisdom.

Do you know why the Eygptians chose the angle of inclination of the
Great Pyramid as 51 degrees 50 minutes ?. It takes a
geometer/astronomer to enjoy that one but you miserable creeps,even if
you could see it do not have the capacity to enjoy it.

1.62 - 3.24 - 6.48 - 12.96 - 25.92 - 51.84.

Even though it has been years since I worked on geometric
progression,nothing gives me more pride and joy than the ancients and
to marvel at their economy and ingenuity.

Here is another one 25 - 30 - 36 - 43.2 - 51.84

All these great things that you never can enjoy because you rob the
astronomer/geometer title and turn my astronomical heritage into an
exercise in photography and gizmos.

51.84 degrees = 51 degrees 50 minutes.


The mind which is free of the empirical tyranny can enjoy the work of
men and creation without having to prove anything no more than nobody
needs to prove music or art right or wrong.Look at the first sequence
from 1.62 to 51.84 latent with significance of the two most fundamental
constants in nature ,Pi and Phi.The ancients knew how to represent all
shapes within a pyramid using the most economic value to represent it
with human architectual tolerances - 51 degrees 50 min .

The crow does not pretend to be an eagle but you and your colleague
pretend you are astronomers/geometers.To be fair there is always a
chance that someday it will happen that men will find themselves out of
the empirical rut to breathe the air of astronomers/geometers and their
insights which have been buried under 3 centuries of empirical garbage.

I hope you suffer the pain of not knowing why the Eygptians chose the
angle of inclination because nobody can teach you why and it is
specifically designed that way,just like the great Judaeo-Christian
heritage.