Waldo Graham wrote:
Bjoern Feuerbacher wrote:

Charlie wrote:
Bjoern Feuerbacher wrote:

[snip]

It does. Here is the calculation:
http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/t=ADeaching/jk1/lectures/node34.ht=ADml

Quote: "Thus, the radiation emitted by a highly relativistic charge
is

focused into an intense beam of angular extent $1/\gamma$ pointing
in
the instantaneous direction of motion."

*In* the direction of motion. *Not* opposite to it!

If someone wants to quibble that this is merely a calculation, then
a
small hint: synchrotron radiation has been known and studied for
decades now. It is routinely used at lots of accelerators facilities
for lots of purposes. Its characteristics are very well studied.

[snip]

IF you are talking about Yoon's atomic model (not Charlie's), and IF
the evidence you provided is correct, then your evidence STRONGLY
SUPPORT Yoon's atomic model (or specifically Yoon's Fig. 1-4-1,
Excerpt, www.yoonsatom.net) rather than contradict it.

Why?
If you look at Fig. 1-4-1, the electric force fluxes "in" the moving
direction (in other words, in front side) is denser (or narrower
spacing) than the opposite direction(in rear side), which means the
electric force is more forceful in front side than that in rear side.
(The angular extent calculated by the evidence you provided, 1/gamma,
might give quantitative measure of Yoon's Fig. 1-4-1, IF your
evidence
is correct.)

If you know high school physics, you can understand that.
It seems beyond your ability for you to understand the synchrotron
radiation or Yoon's theory, either.

Learn high school physics first, idiot Bye Bjoern.

http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y11...tronfluxes.jpg

Waldo. In figure 1.4.1.b The field lines or force fluxes
(as Yoon called it) is not completely behind it because
the electron is moving in slow speed. But in very fast
speed such as 0.7C (or relativistic speed), Dr. Yoon
claimed the force fluxes is almost parallel (as shown in
the bottom of the web site above). This means,
there is no more electric field in 75% of the surrounding
of the electron as all the field is behind it just like Halley's
Comet. Now in synchrotron physics lab. It is claimed
that at relativistic speed, the shape of the electric field is
prolate spheroid. Now we have to find empirical
evidence for this claim. If the lab is correct, then
Yoon is wrong.

I'm just interested in Yoon stuff to get ideas of alternative
electron dynamics that can explain the same data as well
see how creative a guy could get to explain everything without
QM and Relativity. And how ridiculous things would become
before the qm-relativity less model breaks down.

Ch.