Bjoern Feuerbacher wrote:

Charlie wrote:
Bjoern Feuerbacher wrote:

[snip]

It does. Here is the calculation:
http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/t=ADeaching/jk1/lectures/node34.ht=ADml

Quote: "Thus, the radiation emitted by a highly relativistic charge is

focused into an intense beam of angular extent $1/\gamma$ pointing in
the instantaneous direction of motion."

*In* the direction of motion. *Not* opposite to it!

If someone wants to quibble that this is merely a calculation, then a
small hint: synchrotron radiation has been known and studied for
decades now. It is routinely used at lots of accelerators facilities
for lots of purposes. Its characteristics are very well studied.

[snip]

IF you are talking about Yoon's atomic model (not Charlie's), and IF
the evidence you provided is correct, then your evidence STRONGLY
SUPPORT Yoon's atomic model (or specifically Yoon's Fig. 1-4-1,
Excerpt, www.yoonsatom.net) rather than contradict it.

Why?
If you look at Fig. 1-4-1, the electric force fluxes "in" the moving
direction (in other words, in front side) is denser (or narrower
spacing) than the opposite direction(in rear side), which means the
electric force is more forceful in front side than that in rear side.
(The angular extent calculated by the evidence you provided, 1/gamma,
might give quantitative measure of Yoon's Fig. 1-4-1, IF your evidence
is correct.)

If you know high school physics, you can understand that.
It seems beyond your ability for you to understand the synchrotron
radiation or Yoon's theory, either.

Learn high school physics first, idiot Bye Bjoern.