newedana wrote:
I found that Dr. Hansik Yoon clearly explained the Diffraction
Mechanism of Electrons (or Double Slit Experiment, if you like) and
relevant subjects from his new atomic model's viewpoint in the
following contents.

I don't care if he "clearly explains" it or not (and judging from what
you quote below, he is anything but clear - he is as vague as one can
get!). Can he describe the experimental results *quantitatively*?
*That* is the point here.


So, he effectively disproved the wave-particle dualism and the
relativity theory as well as quantum mechanics.

Only if he can explain the observations *quantitatively*.

So far, all you have shown was rhetoric and qualitative handwavings.
That's not physics.



Part II. The Energy World
Chapter 1. Dualism of Wave-Corpuscle
1)Louis de Broglei's Electron
2)How can Moving Electron have a Wave Character
3)Diffraction Mechanism of Charged Particles
4)Energy Dumping by Charged Particles Accelerated
5)Mass Body Never Reduces its Absolute Mass

Dr. Yoon clearly explained the diffraction mechanism of charged
particles(electrons) like that:

A lot of rhetoric yet again. Where are the *quantitative* descriptions?


Because the charged particles perform a longitudinal oscillation when
accelerated,

Evidence, please.


they construct alternative layers of wave phases
constructed with faster and slower speeds.

Longitudinal oscillations of a particle moving along has little to
do with "wave phases".

Add "waves" to the things which Dr. Yoon obviously does not understand.


When collimated electrons
move in parallel and pass through narrow spacing of crystal lattice,
they turn out to build numerous spherical waves

How and why should they?


between which the phase
interference takes place.

And how does he explain that one gets interference patterns even if
one takes care that only one electron at a time goes through the slits?



In the case of destructive interference between different speed wave
phases make charged particles deflect by right angles.

How on earth should that happen? How can two particles moving in the
same directions lead to a deflection at a right angle? Ever heard of
the conservation of momentum?


In the case of
constructive wave phase interference, charged particles can proceed
forward in straight with integrated faster and slower speed.

What does "integrated" mean here?


Thus the
charged particles can build a diffraction pattern as X-ray does as they
pass through the crystal lattice.

Handwaving combined with a lot of unsupported assertions and plain
nonsensical statements. And *this* you call a clear explanation? You
have strange standards.


In short, the mechanism of forming
spherical wave fronts by accelerated charged particles is that when
their plane wave fronts pass through optical apertures they turn out to
be slitted into numerous tiny beams of particle flow.

And how exactly does this work?



Magnetic fluxes induced by these accelerated charged particles result
to bind their shifted electric force fluxes.

And how exactly does this work?


Spherical wave fronts are
thus made possible from accelerated charged particles when their plane
wave fronts pass through crystal lattices.

Agreed. Hint: that's simply Huyghen's principle. We don't need Dr. Yoon's
strange ideas to explain that.



So, while the charged particles keep their speed in constant, the
orientation angle of electric fluxes does not change due to a balance
between the electric repulsion between individual electric force fluxes
and the binding force of self-induced magnetic force fluxes.

Incomprehensible.



I also found that Dr. Yoon explained the X-Ray Diffraction mechanism
from his new atomic model's viewpoint at other part of his book. You
can see the following statement from the preface of the book
(http://www.yoonsatom.net).

"....... How can X-Rays and Gamma-Rays have corpuscular character as
they propagate through the space? It is due to the reason these rays
with the shortest wavelengths are emitted from the innermost electron
rings of atoms of inside layers building material systems,

Gamma rays come from the nucleus, not from the electrons surrounding it.



as they pass through material systems.
so they have to build diffraction beams,

What is a "diffraction beam", and *why* do they have to build that?


In contrast, visible lights are emitted from material surface,

Huh??? Does he mean from the outer electrons, or what???


so they
decrease their intensity uniformly obeying the inverse square distance
rule, as they propagate through the space.

How on earth does that follow???

Oh, BTW, X-rays and gamma rays also obey the inverse square rule. Yet
another thing which Dr. Yoon apparently does not know.


That is why X-Rays and
Gamma-rays behave like corpuscles. ......"

Pardon?????????????

Where in the above did Dr. Yoon explain why X-Rays and gamma rays
behave like corpuscles???

And, BTW: visible light *also* behaves like (composed of) corpuscles.
Dr. Yoon should look up the photo effect.



Dr. Hansik Yoon also explained the diffraction of Light as well as
refraction of Light, stating that the refraction of light is NOT due to
the speed difference of lights propagating in different material
systems with different densities.

Bad for him, since the light speed in materials have been actually
*measured*.


Summary of your post: no explanations, no quantitative descriptions,
only vague handwavings, unsupported assertions, nonsensical
statements, huge jumps in logic, and an amazing display of ignorance.

How on earth did Yoon manage to obtain a PhD? He apparenty knows less
than many layman crackpots.


Bye,
Bjoern