"Sue..." wrote in message
oups.com...
(ds) is squishy because of near-field effects
( dv ) is squishy because of all the matter that might be
contained and the relative motion therein.
(do) is squishy because of near-field effects
So your electrodymanics has adaquate squishiyness to
resolve both postulates of SR.
dr
Thank for coming back Sue I thought my Brit. focus might have offended you.
Your input is valued, I like the new name 'electrodymanics' very
appropriate.:-)
Just changed the oil on the car etc. When you torque up the drain plug and
know that if you don't do it right you will either screw off the thread or
leave it lose so it vibrates out then you feel the torque in your wallet.:-)
and it cut right to your soul :-) and you understand much :-)
s
Your "gravity" section looks vaguely like something I saw in thread
with myself (Sue) and Ken S. Tucker.
dr
This is really yours and Ken's work as far as I can tell, I have just
interpreted it I hope correctly.
s
The mention of the number
4.17 x x 10^42 seems to have caused both parties to run like
scalded dogs.
dr
I dont remember that number at the moment.?
s
The hasty retreat may have been just simple
deferance to the tenacity of the Brits. ;-)
dr
Sorry about the bulldog woof it just my nature and means no harm.
Sue...
This is a colossal number!
http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teachin...es/node25.html