Try bouncing your world and moon off Jupiter, and see what happens.

And I bet you think that my notions are strange about Venus, just wait
until you read into what 'John Ackerman' has to offer that's based as
much as possible upon his hard-science matter of fact interpretations
as to what a few instruments have told us about Venus, and otherwise of
what the oral and reinterpreted recorded history of events that seem to
indicate Venus wasn't always with us, which even somewhat ties into my
weird science logic of what our 750,000 year time-line of CO2 and of
other atmospheric elements having suggested our close association with
the near-UV and UV/a likes of the Sirius star system seems to remain as
the one and only viable external alternative for qualifying the
long-term (105,000 year) cycle of the ice-ages and otherwise
responsible for the necessary window timeline of massive growth cycles
for the likes of diatoms that very much appreciated the longer days
that were absolutely chuck full of near-UV and UV/a photons like we've
never seen before.

Although I don't entirely agree with the Jupiter impact logic, at least
it could have easily represented the massive red zone having been
created upon Jupiter and, it would certainly have represented why our
Venus is so relatively newish in geological terms, and just possibly of
where our moon was derived from. As certainly if the moon of Venus came
along for the ride, after bouncing off Jupiter it certainly would not
have retained the same degree of gravitational association with it's
mother world as those two badly damaged orbs passed nearby Earth.

This sort makes for another terrific super-computer model of
accomplishing all the variables and then watching where each of the
marbles eventually ends up. Since this can be accomplished and it seems
decades after the facts as odd that it hasn't been run through the
mill. Lo and behold, it must therefore represent that it's a darn good
chance of being every bit if not a whole lot better off than the
physics joke of having Earth giving birth to our moon in order that the
supposed moon rocks appear as nearly identical to those of Earth.

At the same time, of what 'John Ackerman' has to offer isn't ruling out
other life, at least not if it were that of imported/visiting ETs or
possibly the remote chance of whatever surviving DNA having come back
to life after their home world bounced off Jupiter. Brother, talk about
folks and their DNA having a seriously bad day, year, century next to
forever after surviving that little happenstance from hell.

http://www.firmament-chaos.com/recent_papers.html
http://www.firmament-chaos.com/papers/fvenuspaper.pdf
John Ackerman, An Alternate View of Venus - July 2002
"Summary: Venus is a hot new planet due to its recent catastrophic
birth from an impact on Jupiter. Evidence presented is based on NASA
Pioneer Venus and Soviet Venera data. Its great internal heat is being
transferred through the crust by the high speed venting of S8, a
staggered ring molecule, via over 200,000 'small domes.' Although S8
dominates the lower atmosphere it was not detected because its mass was
beyond the range of the PV mass spectrometer. S8 crystallizes at
exactly the temperature of the lower cloud layer. It is the great mass
of these heavy molecules and crystals that load the lower atmosphere
and cause the high atmospheric pressure (~91 atm.) at the surface, not
CO2. Radiation from raw lava exposed in surface cracks was registered
by the sensitive radiometer as the main probe passed through the lower
cloud layer, but was arbitrarly thrown out by the scientists "because
signals in all channels increased unreasonably." Much of the other data
was dismissed or misinterpreted in order to be consistent with the
assumed uniformitarian paradigm "

This science author sort of makes the notion of surviving Earth
throughout the worst possible dark ages, mutiple ice-ages and at some
point being pulverized by nearly moon sized meteors a freaking walk in
the park, and that's even if you've been pointed out as hiding WMD and
Osama bin Laden, as I'd rather take on the task of surviving Venus than
the lose cannon wrath of warlord GW Bush, or even if you were a Cathar
with a Pope hot on your trail.

Unfortunately, there's a good amount of what 'John Ackerman' has to say
about Venus that's holding water sort of speak. Although, I personally
believe the crust of Venus is a whole lot more robust than a mere
killometer thick, as per even 10 km thickness is still going to be more
than capable of transfering thermal core energy like there's no
tomarrow. In fact, I'd tend to be on the average of 100 km chrust
thickness side of his relatively short geological timeline argument,
which is not to say there aren't a few remaining one killometer
hot-spots that should be avoided at all cost.

On the flip side of my lose cannon scientific methods, since I'm not
nearly as warm and fuzzy as are these cloned wizards of this and so
many other forums that usually suck, whereas in spite of their
orchestrated flak I'll still offer a few too many of my very own testy
topics (some of which may have timed out) dealing with the likes of our
moon, others with regard to photons, and of course as to the other life
that's existing upon Venus which probably ****ed you off simply because
you hadn't thought of it or otherwise so much as considered of what's
been possible all along;

Photons/Universe or Neutrinos/Universe
How much of Earth is shrinking; 10 mm/year?
Terraforming the moon, before doing Mars or Venus
Anti-Matter/Photons as Blackholes, or 1e100 photons/atom
The Moon, LSE-CM/ISS, Venus and beyond, with He3 to burn
Lunar/Moon Space Elevator, plus another ISS within the CM
Ice Ages directly regulated by Sirius
SETI/GUTH Venus, no kidding
Terraforming the moon
Relocate ISS to ME-L1
MAILGATE sucks, or at least NSA/MI6 sucks
Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus
Censorship of ET truth and nothing but the truth

Otherwise perform a basic search for 'brad guth', or just about
anything including 'guth'.

BTW; If none of those topics are worth your valuable time or within
your expertise, in that case I have a few dozen other topics I'd like
nothing better than improved upon the math and of whatever otherwise
makes the most sense, of which having to make sense doesn't necessarily
have to be whatever the status quo has been insisting, as God forbid
should they be even 1% wrong or perhaps telling the truth and nothing
but the truth and it's 'nondisclosure' self-destruct time.

Basic township that's situated upon Venus:
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm
Basic LSE (Lunar Space Elevator)
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/lunar-space-elevator.htm
Other available topics by; Brad Guth / GASA-IEIS
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm