Max Power wrote:
High Angle Range WU, what is the highest acceptable design value (PR -
telescope)?

David Woolley covered this ...


Why is this not indiacted in the SETI client itself?
Why is the work unit not tagged as [meta-data] invalid for the PR telescope,
if such high Angle Ranges are reached?

Good question ...
I don't know the answer ...
(I'm not helping much so far ...)



Anyone ever see a wu with such an angle range...?

Aha! Yes, I've recieved a number of these WU with angle range of 128.678
just as you have indicated in the table below.

They are all from 20 Nov 2003 at 13:50:05UTC just as you indicate in the
table below. This is the time frame that Project Phoenix was at Arecibo
doing their data collection. Perhaps Peter Backus can check the logs to
see what was going on at this time?

Even though the End RA is wrong (should be 37.066 - 24.000 = 13.066
hours), I think the angle range is right. That is, I don't think the End
RA being wrong caused the angle range to be calculated in error.
Al

===============================
Name 20no03aa.23948.19874.742326.232
Recording Time 11/20/03 1:50 PM
Base Frequency 1,419,765,625
Start RA 22.818 End RA 37.066
Start DEC 24.85 End DEC 18.81
Angle Range 128.678
Receiver ao1420
Best Gaussian score 0.0 power 0.0 fit 0.0
Best Spike score 0.0 power 0.0
Best Pulse score 0.0 power 0.0
Best Triplet score 0.0 power 0.0
Tape Version 1.4
===============================