Thread
:
Death Sentence for the Hubble?
View Single Post
#
192
March 1st 05, 09:48 PM
Rand Simberg
external usenet poster
Posts: n/a
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 18:39:49 +0000 (UTC), in a place far, far away,
(Eric Chomko) made the phosphor on my
monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that:
Rand Simberg ) wrote:
: On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 02:11:15 +0000 (UTC), in a place far, far away,
:
(Eric Chomko) made the phosphor on my
: monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that:
: : Such as? I can't think of any other than X-33. I'm not aware that
: : X-34 had anything to do with manned spaceflight, and DC-XA wasn't
: : really a Clinton initiative--they just inherited it (unless by
: : "support" you mean "not go out of their way to kill"). And one of the
: : few line item vetoes that Clinton used (before the USSC ruled it
: : unconstitutional) was to kill funding for the military spaceplane in
: : 1997.
:
: The question remains should NASA develop potential military spacecraft?
: That question has nothing to do with anything written here by anyone.
: Once again, you are the supreme village idiot of the newsgroup, and
: master of the non-sequitur.
Yeah, it is so far not related that you went out of your way at ad
hominem, again. Why don't you state WHY it isn't related.
Because NASA is a civilian agency, and DOESN'T DEVELOP MILITARY
AIRCRAFT OR SPACECRAFT.
I will learn all you know, pass you and expose you along the way. Of that
I am certain! You had better ratcheted it up a notch to even last a year
in this gambit. Mark my word!
Knock yourself out.
Rand Simberg