Rand Simberg ) wrote:
: On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 02:11:15 +0000 (UTC), in a place far, far away,
: (Eric Chomko) made the phosphor on my
: monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that:


: : Such as? I can't think of any other than X-33. I'm not aware that
: : X-34 had anything to do with manned spaceflight, and DC-XA wasn't
: : really a Clinton initiative--they just inherited it (unless by
: : "support" you mean "not go out of their way to kill"). And one of the
: : few line item vetoes that Clinton used (before the USSC ruled it
: : unconstitutional) was to kill funding for the military spaceplane in
: : 1997.
:
: The question remains should NASA develop potential military spacecraft?

: That question has nothing to do with anything written here by anyone.
: Once again, you are the supreme village idiot of the newsgroup, and
: master of the non-sequitur.

Yeah, it is so far not related that you went out of your way at ad
hominem, again. Why don't you state WHY it isn't related.

Does the phrase "the military spaceplane" appear in an above paragragh?
Huh, it does. I guess you stand corrected, yet again. It is that sort of
pomposity that you display that has be committed to exposing you as the
fraud that you are.

: rest of village idiocy snipped

As I have said, if YOU are anything in the way of commercial space, other
than a cheerleader, then it is doomed to fail due to imcompetence. That
may occur with you as a mere cheerleader as well!

I will learn all you know, pass you and expose you along the way. Of that
I am certain! You had better ratcheted it up a notch to even last a year
in this gambit. Mark my word!

Eric