View Single Post
  #3  
Old February 24th 05, 09:32 PM
Brad Guth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I have no freaking idea as to how or why the previous reply got so
screwed up. Perhaps I'll have to repost, along with a few testy
improvement.

In the meanwhile it's lose cannon time again.
Since folks haven't been playing by the rules, by way of their not
accomplishing a damn honest thing except reinforcing upon their
mainstream status quo or bust, which represents that they're knowingly
remaining as pro perpetrated cold-war(s) and thereby pro upon every
dastardly aspect that goes along with it. As such, I may have to post
the following on behalf of someone other that actually matters, of
getting their attention focused upon the truth of what's obtainable on
roughly one cent upon the dollar, or rather on a payback of perhaps
10:1 if the LSE-CM/ISS and of interplanetary communications is only
worth 10% of what I've anticipated. Do the math.

Discrediting the LSE-CM/ISS from what's technically obtainable, and
then especially discounting Venus from the zone of life is about as
intellectually pathetic as milking a cow and then eating the damn cow
so that via evidence exclusion one can deny where that milk ever came
from.

In so many different words, I'll 'say it again Sam'; there's no law of
physics nor other scientific exclusionary interpretations that forbids
other life from coexisting upon Venus, and to even think otherwise is
being borg-like arrogant and/or illusionary if not criminally insane.

The likes of F.W. Taylor, P.L. Read, S.R. Lewis, John Ackerman and
James McCanney haven't gone so far as to exclude other life, especially
other evolution that's survival smarter than humanity (how hard could
that be?), thus along with a little intelligent design and if need be
applied technology as for accommodating other life upon Venus isn't
impossible. Persay, these individuals are not even your average village
idiots, nor are there none others accepting towards an alternative view
of Venus, as well as upon the positive notions of what our moon has to
offer. So, what's your problem?

Of course, and whatever you do, don't bother telling anything to our
NASA because, they still think the moon is nothing but a worthless mass
of something ejected from the core of mother Earth, and that it can be
safely walked upon for days on end while in essentially an EVA
birthday-suit, just like they think Mars and Venus are essentially the
same age as Earth, and that our solar system has never been anywhere
near the Sirius star system, much less arriving on any 105,000 year
orbit association with Sirius.

So, unless you have some new and improved interpretations of the laws
of physics, biology and/or that of applied technology that couldn't
persay be of any value nor even adapted as to function upon Venus, as
please do contribute whatever it is that you've got. Otherwise, and if
need be just for the sporting fun of it all, contribute something on
behalf of the positive side of these can-do topics, which isn't
stipulating that you or anyone other has to concur entirely with my
interpretations, although it might be a little nice if you were at
least somewhere in the ballpark.

Regards, Brad Guth / GASA-IEIS
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm