View Single Post
  #8  
Old February 14th 05, 02:20 AM
David M. Palmer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Charles Buckley
wrote:

David M. Palmer wrote:
In article , Max Beerbohm
wrote:



Seriously, if you are going to say that there is no reason not to do a
Hubble visit, you need to address the safety issue - as some on this
group have done.

The article above is poorly researched because of this.



The expected risk cost is ~0.1 lives and 0.015 shuttles (assuming a
1/70 chance of disaster with each shuttle mission not to ISS).


Recalculate for 1/50 That is the current safety rating.


OK, increase the equivalent amounts of travel with 50% more.

It's not a safety issue.


I agree.

I was replying to someone saying it was a safety issue.

--
David M. Palmer (formerly @clark.net, @ematic.com)