View Single Post
  #9  
Old February 14th 05, 02:44 AM
Jorge R. Frank
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Charles Buckley wrote in
:

David M. Palmer wrote:
In article , Max Beerbohm
wrote:



Seriously, if you are going to say that there is no reason not to do a
Hubble visit, you need to address the safety issue - as some on this
group have done.

The article above is poorly researched because of this.



The expected risk cost is ~0.1 lives and 0.015 shuttles (assuming a
1/70 chance of disaster with each shuttle mission not to ISS).


Recalculate for 1/50 That is the current safety rating.


According to whom? Cite your sources, please.

At *worst*, it's 1/56.5 (+ post-CAIB safety improvements).

*Reasonably*, it's 1/88, (+ post-CAIB safety improvements).

Again, *cite* your sources, if you have any.
--
JRF

Reply-to address spam-proofed - to reply by E-mail,
check "Organization" (I am not assimilated) and
think one step ahead of IBM.