"Colonel K" wrote:
Spend less time ROTFL and more time pondering whether someone just
might know something you don't, or just entertain the novelty of a different
viewpoint. Ahhh, you won't bother.

Ahhh... I've done it multiple times, which you'd know if you've been
here as long as you claim.

But never from a person who answers the question "what is the basis
for that statement" with "believe me, I know".

You're just a newsgroup bully.

Nope. I'm just someone who pushes people to support their statements
and substitute thought for handwaving. Some people don't like it that
their unsubstantiated word isn't good enough.

I can't think of a single significant poster on these groups whose
toes I haven't held to the fire at least once over the years. Oddly
enough, no one but you seems to have problem with such treatement.

You've shown that repeatedly in the past, as well - sometimes with me in my
true identity.

Another statement you wish us to take on faith with proof or support
on your part. Not happening. Period.

D.
--
The STS-107 Columbia Loss FAQ can be found
at the following URLs:

Text-Only Version:
http://www.io.com/~o_m/columbia_loss_faq.html

Enhanced HTML Version:
http://www.io.com/~o_m/columbia_loss_faq_x.html

Corrections, comments, and additions should be
e-mailed to , as well as posted to
sci.space.history and sci.space.shuttle for
discussion.