On Mon, 2 Feb 2004 15:02:38 -0000, "Paul Blay"
wrote:

"Paul Blay" wrote ...
www.geocities.com/markpeeters96/a.html

Gee, question 4 is fun. I'm still clicking, waiting for argument 10 of 10 ... ;-)

Argument 1 : There is NO SCIENTIFIC PROOF about this.
Argument 2 : There is NO SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATION about this
Argument 3 : There is NO PUBLIC DEMONSTRATION about this
Argument 4 : There is NO SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION about this
Argument 5 : There is NO WAY you can BE VERY SURE about this
Argument 6 : There is NO PERSON in your environment that has EVER experienced this
Argument 7 : There is NO publication of a higher velocity than 600km/hr AT SEA-level
NOT for a TGV, NOT for formule-one-CAR...
Argument 8 :The hearing of a "boom" is NO PROOF of reaching 1200km/hr
Argument 9 : An eye-witness on TV is as much reliable as the claim of
WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION IN IRAK

No argument 10. What a pity - I was just about to be convinced but then it
stops short.

You've got to admire his vice-like grip on logic - he never lets it excape onto his page.

(Although as he's writing in some mythical language none of it counts anyway).

Have you been to some of the other pages? This one is good...

http://www.geocities.com/markpeeters96/z001.html

Cheers,
Richard