"Paul Blay" wrote ...
www.geocities.com/markpeeters96/a.html

Gee, question 4 is fun. I'm still clicking, waiting for argument 10 of 10 ... ;-)

Argument 1 : There is NO SCIENTIFIC PROOF about this.
Argument 2 : There is NO SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATION about this
Argument 3 : There is NO PUBLIC DEMONSTRATION about this
Argument 4 : There is NO SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION about this
Argument 5 : There is NO WAY you can BE VERY SURE about this
Argument 6 : There is NO PERSON in your environment that has EVER experienced this
Argument 7 : There is NO publication of a higher velocity than 600km/hr AT SEA-level
NOT for a TGV, NOT for formule-one-CAR...
Argument 8 :The hearing of a "boom" is NO PROOF of reaching 1200km/hr
Argument 9 : An eye-witness on TV is as much reliable as the claim of
WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION IN IRAK

No argument 10. What a pity - I was just about to be convinced but then it
stops short.

You've got to admire his vice-like grip on logic - he never lets it excape onto his page.

(Although as he's writing in some mythical language none of it counts anyway).