"Fred J. McCall" wrote in
:

"Jorge R. Frank" wrote:

:"Fred J. McCall" wrote in
m:
:
: Note that if NASA figures are to be believed, it would cost MORE now
: (in constant dollars) to put a couple men on the Moon than it cost us
: the first time we did it.
:
:NASA's figures show no such thing.

Then they revised the hell out of them, because that's certainly what
they showed the first time they were asked.

No, they did not. The CBO's analysis of NASA's figures show a cost of $63.8
billion through the first lunar landing, which is less than the
corresponding $77.9 billion figure for Apollo (both figures adjusted for
inflation). (source: CBO)

If you have a cite for your figures, I'd love to see it.

--
JRF

Reply-to address spam-proofed - to reply by E-mail,
check "Organization" (I am not assimilated) and
think one step ahead of IBM.