Paul Hollister wrote:
Shawn wrote:

So forget the data that supports the Big Bang? Your model needs to
convincingly explain this FIRST. If not, your dead in the water.
When I searched your site for "red shift" I came up with zippo.


What did you search the site with Shawn? The search engine at the bottom of
each page in the site, which contains a book that is 340 pages long,
provides positive search results for both "red shift" and "redshift"

snip

My bad. I only searched the fist page not the site.


The entire scientific world assumes for a fact that all of the hydrogen in
the universe was formed fait accompli 10 to 20 billion years ago by the
single Big Bang, long before the galaxies began to form. On the blind side
of this assumption, nobody even considers for a moment that the Cosmic
Plasma Jets exploding out of Quasars and Active Galactic Nuclei (AGNs),
which are the most powerful explosions in the universe occurring in the most
extreme supermassive densities in the universe, may be the Big-Bang process
of hydrogen production exploding into evidence right in front of our eyes!

The insight and evidence I have assembled shows that hydrogen is being
produced by an ongoing process within each quasar, for which I coined the
term "Ongoing Big-Bang" to emphasize the ongoing nature of the
nucleosynthesis process. After demonstrating through evidence that this is
indeed how all the hydrogen in the universe is formed, I showed how this
"Ongoing Big-Bang" process gives rise to the growth and evolution of each
active galaxy, which defines the Mainstream Sequence of Galaxy Evolution!
This is an entirely new scientific insight Shawn. You can download Chapter 1
Introduction with just a click of your finger. Chapter 1 Introduction shows
how the 4-spatial dimensions of this theory correlates directly with
Einstein's Space-Time model of the universe.

Maybe your right. Not for me to decide. Go convince the heavy
breathers in the cosmology world that your model's worth a look see,
then I'll be interested.

Shawn