Paul Hollister wrote:
Although the Big Bang Theory is mathematically sound, the a priori existence
of a nearly infinite supermassive density from which the big bang arose is
an unsupported assumption that doesn$B!G(Bt make physical sense.

I find this quote on your site illuminating:

With a Big Bang origin for each galaxy, the expansion of the universe
would need further study for understanding, because Space itself would
not explode into existence and expand from a Point of Singularity; and
the cosmic microwave background radiation would need further study for
understanding, because it would no longer be just the lingering embers
from of a single Hot Point of explosion affecting the temperature of
the entire Cosmos for 20 billion years;

So forget the data that supports the Big Bang? Your model needs to
convincingly explain this FIRST. If not, your dead in the water.
When I searched your site for "red shift" I came up with zippo.


Shawn