Dr John Stockton,
Clearly there's still an ongoing GOOGLE "Server error" as they'd like
to call it, that which is clearly hindering my posting replies even
into my own topics. In spite of that ongoing orchestrated opposition,
I'll attempt to reply to what "Dr John Stockton" was suggesting as
being a fairly good notion of securing whatever's necessary by using
cables, ropes or whatever is suitable as rigging that'll take all of
the stress that could possibly be induced by continually thrusting ISS
for 10+ hours, or even 100+ hours if limited to 0.01 m/s/s.

If need be, I'll edit this into my growing topics page or create yet
another entirely specific report as to addressing these and other
issues, whereas there's darn little if anything the mainstream status
quo can manage as to foil my efforts at sharing upon whatever I believe
is worth doing, or at least openly discussing.

Frankly, I and apparently a few others thar reside outside of the
NASA/Apollo box foresee nothing that's insurmountable about relocating
ISS into the ME-L1 nullification sweet-spot. However, it's as though
our NASA want's nothing better than seeing the likes of ISS and Hubble
bite the dust. Perhaps they're wagering good odds on the failure of the
next resupply mission, and if need be their Boeing/TRW Phantom Works
ABL team could perhaps accomplish some of their field testing that'll
essentially kill off two birds with one friendly cannon shot.

Regards, Brad GUTH / GASA~IEIS http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm