"Ken S. Tucker" wrote in message
m...
Jack Sarfatti wrote in message
.com...
Inertial compensation in REST LIF? NO!
Inertial compensation in REST LNIF? YES!


The Principle of the General Theory of Relativity is
firm, there in no negotiation. Let me state that very
clear. You can be in an FoR (aka CS) and read either
0.01 g's or a gazillion g's on an accelometer attached
to that FoR, and it wouldn't matter, because the laws
of physics apply to you no matter your acceleration,
one doesn't escape the universe.


Really?

I read a nice poem the other day. Please give
me the physics or equation for it.

A simple sentence or emotion is beyond the
comprehension of physics and math. And it
always will be. And these things, such as ideas
or instincts, are far more defining properties
of our reality. Something as pedestrian as
a simple cloud, or a three body problem, is
beyond the grasp of your physics.

You'll 'complain' that this is irrelevant, but
in truth your answer to the things that /most/
define us is ...'you don't know'.

Your 'religion' is limited and empty.
btw, your universal laws and constants
evolve....adapt...CHANGE over time.
Nature...evolution.../Darwin/ defines the
physical universe, not the other way around.

Your science is still mired in the Dark Ages.


A Quintessential Introduction to Dark Energy
Dept of Physics, Princeton University
http://wwwphy.princeton.edu/~steinh/...steinhardt.pdf
http://wwwphy.princeton.edu/~steinh/


Jonathan


"THEIR height in heaven comforts not,
Their glory nought to me;
'T was best imperfect, as it was;
I 'm finite, I can't see.

The house of supposition,
The glimmering frontier
That skirts the acres of perhaps,
To me shows insecure.

The wealth I had contented me;
If 't was a meaner size,
Then I had counted it until
It pleased my narrow eyes

Better than larger values,
However true their show;
This timid life of evidence
Keeps pleading, "I don't know."


By E Dickinson


s




A "Rip-Snorting" adventure...
Ken S. Tucker