yes! Drizzling works with under-sampled images, with a FWHM smaller than 2.0
pixels
(and the benefits really appear under 1.5 pixels), and it cannot be the case
at the F-ratio
used here.

"Martin Brown" a écrit dans le message
news: ...
However the Drizzle algorithm was developed for use with
*under*-sampled images. I don't think it claims resolution of high
spatial frequency detail beyond the limitations imposed by the optics
of the instrument (Rayleigh criterion, Dawes limit or Sparrow limit -
but that's another argument).