View Single Post
  #2  
Old November 16th 04, 08:55 AM
Blok
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



John Savard wrote:

On 15 Nov 2004 07:50:11 -0800, (Dawn
Baird-Chleborad) wrote, in part:

A very respectable SAA member wrote:
Also featured on the cover was a story dealing with the TRUTH about
astrology. Has the National Enquirer obtained the magazine?"


That certainly is an exaggeration; since the TRUTH about astrology is
that it's a bunch of nonsense, and Astronomy magazine doubtless
reaffirmed that...

for that matter, the latest issue of National Geographic magazine has,
on its cover, "Was Darwin Wrong?"... but they answer with a resounding
"No" on the inside.

But then, National Geographic *did* publish a swimsuit issue last
year...


I missed that. Was it swimsuits on Eskimows? Pretty funny. Personally
I think this commercialistic crap has gone far enough. What's next. Swim
suits on dogs? It would sell@ Im beginning to believe Osama is right~!






Sober respectability just isn't what it used to be, I guess.

Still, though, while the National Enquirer doesn't own Astronomy
magazine, it _is_ owned by the same company that publishes _Model
Railroader_ - Kalmbach.

John Savard
http://home.ecn.ab.ca/~jsavard/index.html