October 2, 2003

Paul Lawler wrote:

Would those be the "conditional" scientific methods instead of the absolute

The conditional evidence implies that ET is most probably infinitely smarter
than you, and mobile. Thus, I suggest you start referring to your best modeling
of the best available evidence, instead of sticking your head up your ass,
because even if ET is fooling around with your mind, you wouldn't be able to
recognize it, and you certainly wouldn't be able to 'see' it. The show me the
bodies and crashed ufos argument is so lame as to be laughable. "If aliens have
visited us, where is the picnic garbage and ufo exhaust" - typical amateur
astronomer logic.

Whatever ...

Whatever ...? That's your best argument? Whatever?

When arguing with an idiot like you, yes.

However, since you snipped it :

Hubble HDF and UDF - simple calculations indicate the number of large galaxies
in a
WMAP estimated universe of 13.7 billion years old is 1 billion, and I
observe
one Earthlike planet in one average galaxy. The result follows.

Of course, some humans claim intelligence, but you convincingly fail to
demonstrate it.

Thomas Lee Elifritz
http://elifritz.members.atlantic.net