Thomas Lee Elifritz wrote in
:

October 1, 2004

Paul Lawler wrote:

You are really 'out there', if you think there is *NO* evidence for
ET.

Small correction. I didn't say there was no evidence "for" ET, I
said there was no evidence "of" ET.

I love it when people say that they will believe it when they 'see'
it, as if photons can be 'seen'.

I am very happy for you... but I didn't say that, did I? Don't you think
it likely that intelligent ET life would be apt to take a form a bit more
tangible than photons?

Prepare for greatness, Paul, you have a wonderful future ahead of you
in the field of major scientific discoveries in nature and major
scientific breakthroughs of understanding of the universe.

And despite your sarcasm, there's still no empirical evidence of anything
other than probability. Sorry, no Nobel for you.