nightbat wrote
Ray Vingnutte wrote:
On Thu, 09 Sep 2004 02:11:42 -0500
nightbat wrote:
nightbat wrote
Ray Vingnutte wrote:
Two or three years ago I came across these ideas, at first I thought
oh yeah, come on, but you know it has sort of grown on me. As Hoyle
was supposedly once to have said ' it's a put-up job' referring to
the universe.
The more I learn about the universe the more it makes me wonder,
this is a put-up job isn't it?.
nightbat
Well Ray, from a theoretical Sir Fred Hoyle sci fi steady
state one perhaps versus from a nightbat formidable basic disturbed
multi overlapping field one trying to normalize, but in either case,
the former nullifying because of energy's nature. Now if scientist's
could ascertain cause of outside force to explain original imputed non
uniform force impetus or equal or greater neutralizing force
potential, no outside designer is necessary. Sir Hoyle was a great
astrophysicist, mathematician, sci fi theorist and with some
scientific associates formulated a great many valuable interesting
papers, publications, and observations including to be within limits
of steady state premise. But the Universe is not Einstein cosmological
constant static, or single all originating point energy negating Big
Bang, despite cosmic background radiation, or in a Hoyle and Co's.
proposed steady state condition, but a nightbat constant flex or
disturbed momentum one.
I know, then when does the scientific peer reviewed paper or multi
interest addressed exciting books come out to the local bookstore
nearest you? When does the World finally get the GUT that makes easy
reading sense, so insightful Double-A and the rest of the star gazers
can sleep better? Why did this simple premise miss the great minds of
some of the most enlightened scientist's of the 20th century?
Well for one, who took unanimous usenet posters seriously, and who has
the time to appease the formal most demanding main stream process when
you're so busy applying your working model to further discovery? Who
wants to be made an authority with it's famous Einstein's Nobel and
reported curse of lost of privacy and free research time? So why did
they miss it, they were just as theoretically busy as nightbat but
more inclined to academic plus fame acceptance notoriety, formal book
publishing schedules and demands, and most, ha, ha, just didn't make
it into the 21st century.
the nightbat
Ray
I'm sorry but I have to say I don't really know what you are talking
about or what you are saying.
Perhaps if I post a link to the sort of stuff I have found very
interesting and that may lead in some future time to my requiring
the services of a Psychiatrist may help.. Don't read or follow up on any
of this stuff in the link below if you are of a fragile disposition, I
thought I could handle it at first, I thought I would know when to stop
but I can't handle it at all..I keep going back there looking for
updates etc.
http://www.simulation-argument.com/
nightbat
Don't let it concern you Ray, then let it go, for the most
astute scientific theoretical minds just couldn't grasp it either. But I
agree with you about sci fi simulation scenarios, especially
philosophically analyzed, and any sci fi orientated material in general,
it is mostly non real world based or actualized and therefore lay person
perplexing. I am a champion therefore against sci fi when not labeled as
so because it does have the tendency to while stimulate some hardier
flexible minds, possibly confusing, frightening, and corrupting others.
They don't call higher theoretical physics, abstract math, complex
topological space mapping deep waters for no reason. It is noted, many a
beautiful mind has been sometimes lost in alluring but dangerous deep
logical and analytical attempted formulation.
Forget attempted cross subject discipline treatments, look what happened
to poor poster Shastry, leave them to the sci fi and Hollywood book and
screen writers. If you find them interesting, as many are, take care to
view them cautiously, remembering the sci fi subjects are hypothetical
concepts, not mathematically proofed or present real world based.
the nightbat