wrote in message .. .
Fred Bloggs writes:

And the below doesn't, Tholen?

Obviously it doesn't, Bloggs.

Obviously, Tholen? I disagree - it's a pretty good indication.

Classic inconsistency!

You're erroneously presupposing that what was below constitutes
antagonism, Bloggs.

It antagonises, to the extent that many people feel compelled to
respond. If that's not antagonistic, how come the posts which you feel
compelled to respond to can fairly be described as such?

As did the antagonist-in-chief.

I already noted that bisectional did, Bloggs. No need to repeat
it.

No need to repeat anything, really.