"MichaelJP" wrote in message
...
"Robin Leadbeater" wrote in message
...

"Dr Paul J Henney" wrote in message
...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3376343.stm


I have just been watching the newscast. (www.beagle2 .com) Although CP
has
not completely given up hope, reasoning that this might be his last
chance
with the worlds press present, he made his pitch to be given the
oportunity
to have another go. His view was that a specific lander mission with the
same objective should be made in 2007 in preference to another orbiter
mission. I wish him good luck!

Robin

I think if the current NASA landers are successful, the next mission to
really capture the public imagination will be to take an aircraft to Mars.
I
believe a lot of work has been done on these "Mars Flyers" and they will
be
able to explore areas that will always be too risky to attempt to drop a
lander near.

I think this is also a possibility for the NASA Mars Scout 2007 mission so
maybe Pillinger could try and get in there first again!

- Michael



I think the decision should be based on the likliehood of finding evidence
of life. Personally A Rover sent to one of the poles would be one of my
choices. I'm not too sure what one of the flyers could actually achieve,
especially with the high quality imaging available from an orbiter?

The ultimate has to be a plan to send humans to Mars, if only NASA wasn't
being bled dry by the totally pointless ISS, they could have got the US,
Russia, Europe & Japan to work on a joint mission. That would be the
ultimate and I suspect the only way we will ever know for sure if life does
or did exist on Mars. Personally because of the lack of money and the
necessary technology to do it in a reasonably safe way I don't see it
happening within the next 50 years, not unless there is a major change in
the attitude to manned spaceflight. And I suspect that if we do send men
back beyond the orbit of Earth it will be back to the moon first.

Martin